![]() ![]() The other five bogus cases were called Shaboon v. Five other "decisions submitted by plaintiff's counsel contain similar deficiencies and appear to be fake as well," Castel wrote. "The bogus 'Varghese' decision contains internal citations and quotes, which, in turn, are nonexistent," Castel wrote. ![]() China Southern Airlines opinion cited several precedents that don't exist. The filings included not only names of made-up cases but also a series of exhibits with "excerpts" from the bogus decisions. Six of the submitted cases appear to be bogus judicial decisions with bogus quotes and bogus internal citations." "A submission filed by plaintiff's counsel in opposition to a motion to dismiss is replete with citations to non-existent cases. "The Court is presented with an unprecedented circumstance," Castel wrote in a previous order on May 4. In an order on Friday, Castel scheduled a June 8 hearing at which Schwartz, fellow attorney Peter LoDuca, and the law firm must show cause for why they should not be sanctioned. The lawyer's affidavit said he had "never utilized ChatGPT as a source for conducting legal research prior to this occurrence and therefore was unaware of the possibility that its content could be false." Judge weighs “unprecedented circumstance”įederal Judge Kevin Castel is considering punishments for Schwartz and his associates. Schwartz didn't previously consider the possibility that an artificial intelligence tool like ChatGPT could provide false information, even though AI chatbot mistakes have been extensively reported by non-artificial intelligence such as the human journalists employed by reputable news organizations. Schwartz admitted that he "relied on the legal opinions provided to him by a source that has revealed itself to be unreliable," and stated that it is his fault for not confirming the sources provided by ChatGPT. The "citations and opinions in question were provided by ChatGPT which also provided its legal source and assured the reliability of its content," he wrote. Schwartz wrote that "the use of generative artificial intelligence has evolved within law firms" and that he "consulted the artificial intelligence website ChatGPT in order to supplement the legal research performed." Lawyer Steven Schwartz of the firm Levidow, Levidow, & Oberman "greatly regrets having utilized generative artificial intelligence to supplement the legal research performed herein and will never do so in the future without absolute verification of its authenticity," Schwartz wrote in an affidavit on May 24 regarding the bogus citations previously submitted in US District Court for the Southern District of New York. Getty Images | Andrey Popov reader comments 276 withĪ lawyer is in trouble after admitting he used ChatGPT to help write court filings that cited six nonexistent cases invented by the artificial intelligence tool. **SEALED**COMPLAINT against USA (ED) (Filing fee $402, Receipt number AUSFCC-8696577) (Copy of sealed complaint served by secure email on Department of Justice), filed by THALIN, LLC. Redaction of #1 Complaint, FILED UNDER SEAL. **SEALED**PROPOSED REDACTED DOCUMENT, filed by THALIN, LLC. MOTION to Seal Document #1 Complaint, filed by THALIN, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(sh) MOTION for Protective Order, filed by THALIN, LLC. On July 25, 2017, the Senate Judiciary Committee held a hearing on his nomination. Bush, who assumed senior status on October 21, 2013. Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement, filed by THALIN, LLC. On June 7, 2017, President Trump nominated Schwartz to serve as a Judge of the United States Court of Federal Claims, to the seat vacated by Judge Lynn J. Notice of Random Assignment Pursuant to Rule 40.1(a) to Judge Stephen S. NOTICE of Designation of Electronic Case. ![]() NOTICE of Appearance by Eric Evan Laufgraben for USA. This docket was last retrieved on May 8, 2023. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |